In copyright law, it is a statutory right of an author to terminate a transfer or license after 35 years. Specific requirements apply to the timing and making of the termination request. You should consult an attorney if you are considering exercising a termination right or if another person has exercised, or intends to exercise, […]
What is the “termination right”? Read More »
No. Crediting the author can be good practice but it does not obviate the need for fair use analysis or permission.
Does crediting the author make a use of a work fair use? Read More »
Creative Commons-licensed works are not necessarily in the public domain. A work with a “CC0 ” (CC Zero) dedication may have the effect of dedicating it to the public domain. Other kinds of Creative Commons licenses, however, do not have that effect. Creative Commons “share alike” licenses, such as CC BY-SA 2.5 ,might authorize sharing
Are Creative-Commons-licensed works in the public domain? Read More »
Copyright management information (“CMI”) is information conveyed in connection with copies or other embodiments of a work relating to the title, author, copyright owner, and terms of use for the work. A copyright notice is an example of copyright management information.
What is “copyright management information”? Read More »
Liability for copyright infringement may exist even if the author is credited. Giving the author credit does not eliminate the need to secure permission from the copyright owner to use the work. Copyright infringement differs from plagiarism in this respect.
Is it copyright infringement if the author is given full credit? Read More »
To disclose the use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) in the creation of a work, specifically identify and describe the AI-generated content in the Limitation of Claim portion of the copyright application. In addition, you will need to specifically describe the human contribution to the work in the Author Created field. You can use the Note
Where in a copyright application should AI use be disclosed? Read More »
Using AI-generated output in a work does not necessarily prevent registration of a copyright in the work. If a work is entirely AI-generated, then yes, copyright protection cannot be claimed. This is true even if a human provided the prompts for the output. If the output contains significant human-authored expression, however, a claim of copyright
Content that is generated entirely by an AI (artificial intelligence) system or tool is not protected by copyright. Copyright protection exists only for works created by humans, as explained in an article in Cokato Copyright Attorney (The Law Blog of Thomas James). On the other hand, copyright may be claimed in the human contribution to
Is AI-generated output protected by copyright? Read More »
In the United States, the general rule is that the term of a copyright is the life of the author plus 70 years. This rule is subject to some important exceptions, though: Work made for hire The copyright in a work made for hire lasts for 95 years after the date of first publication or
How long does copyright protection last? Read More »
The author initially owns the copyright in the work. In most cases, the author is the person who actually creates the work. In the case of a work made for hire, however, the employer or person who specially commissions the creation of the work is deemed the author.
Who initially owns the copyright in a work? Read More »
